A highly unusual and controversial case in Turkey has drawn widespread attention. Uğur Korunmaz, known as the "Badeci Sheikh," stood trial in Bursa for serious allegations involving sexual assault, founding an illegal religious sect, and possession of child pornography. The case has sparked both outrage and disbelief due to the nature of the allegations and the subsequent court decision.
According to the 3rd Bursa Heavy Penal Court's justified ruling (Case File: 2011/318-559), Uğur Korunmaz was accused of operating under the guise of the "Nakşibendi-Halidiye Order's Kırklar Branch". Prosecutors detailed disturbing rituals allegedly required of his followers, including sexual acts described as "badeleme" (a ritual involving oral contact with Korunmaz's genitalia) and further sexual interactions to "advance" within the sect.
The prosecution claimed that Korunmaz manipulated his followers, exploiting their limited religious knowledge to convince them that these acts were necessary for spiritual progression and entry into heaven. The rituals were reportedly carried out in what followers referred to as the "Secret Room" of the sect’s lodge.
Defendant's Defense:
In his defense, Uğur Korunmaz admitted to the sexual acts but claimed they were part of the sect’s established spiritual practices. He denied coercion, stating that the followers willingly participated and that these rituals were a means to elevate their spiritual "rank." Korunmaz rejected allegations of possessing child or animal pornography, asserting that such materials were planted in the lodge’s library by unknown individuals.
Several followers, both male and female, testified that they participated in the rituals willingly, viewing them as an integral part of the sect's customs. Some described the acts as spiritually transformative, while others claimed psychological distress only after the events became public.
Court's Decision:
Despite the shocking details, the court ruled that since the victims were over 18 years old, legally competent, and consented to the acts, no criminal offense was committed. The court referenced Article 223/2-a of the Turkish Penal Code, which states that acts performed with mutual consent do not constitute a crime.
The case has left the public divided, with many questioning the boundaries of consent and the exploitation of religious beliefs. While some view the court's ruling as a legal technicality, others are calling for greater scrutiny of such sects and their practices.
Public Reaction:
The case has sparked heated debates on social media and among legal experts. Critics argue that the ruling highlights a gap in Turkey's legal system regarding the manipulation of vulnerable individuals under the guise of religious authority.
This unprecedented case continues to raise ethical, legal, and societal questions about consent, religious exploitation, and the role of the judiciary in addressing such complex issues.
